Of all the nudnik 2016 presidential wannabes (Peter King! Martin O’Malley! Come on down!), Scott Brown (R-Fox News) ranks among the most delusional. But you’d never know that from reading the Boston Herald.
Today’s Page One:
Inside, the feisty local tabloid is plenty giddy itself, starting with a sunnyside up semi-news story.
Nation may learn what Scott Brown can do for U.S.
National Republicans rushed to give former U.S. Sen. Scott Brown’s presidential trial balloon a thumbs up yesterday, saying the Bay State moderate’s impassioned plea for a big tent party could be the 2016 anecdote to debilitating GOP infighting.
“I’m thrilled he’s here. I see 2016 as wide open both nationally and in Iowa — especially if a candidate can come here and make a strong case,” said Iowa Republican committee chairman A.J. Striker. “I think having a diverse field actually strengthens and grows the party.”
Certainly grows the coffers of the Iowa Republican committee, yeah?
Then there’s this legit opinion piece by Kimberly Atkins:
Wait – more good news in the Scott Brown Gazette! His daughter Arianna just got engaged! To “a paralegal specialist at the Department of Justice and a former Brown Senate office intern”!
The only skunk at the Herald garden party was this letter writer:
Brown’s betrayal
Bona fide registered Republicans, who share conservative fiscal values and liberal social views, wish Scott Brown would just go back to his obscure role as a member of the corrupt Massachusetts House or Senate (“Brown: ‘Infighting’ aids Dems,” Aug. 16).
He has disappointed a majority of Republicans and moderates who elected him on a false belief he shared their views of less government intervention in their lives. Unfortunately, like every other RINO, he blindsided us with his decisive vote on the Consumer “Destruction” Act. Shame on him for scolding the members of his party who support Republican values.
— Todd Douglas, Weston
So Brown’s disappointed Republicans and moderates? That won’t put much giddy-up in a presidential campaign, will it?
Which is essentially what Adrian Walker writes crosstown in the Boston Globe today.
I don’t want to make light of Brown’s presidential prospects. It’s just hard to believe that he has any presidential prospects. For starters, he lost his last election by a substantial margin, something unusual for a sitting senator.
And his so-called brand of politics is far out of step with the leadership of his own party. There’s not much reason to believe the GOP wants a nominee whose main qualification is that he can draw support from Massachusetts moderates. Why would a party that got trounced with Mitt Romney in 2012 turn around and nominate Scott Brown?
Walker’s conclusion is that Brown can’t stand being out of the spotlight, so “[t]he quest for attention has become his never-ending campaign.”
At least he’s raised his sights, though. Here’s what the Herald reported yesterday about Brown’s fondest wishes:
Brown, who’s tapped into his musical side since his November defeat to Elizabeth Warren, said he’ll make his “debut” next month playing guitar with his daughter, Ayla, when she opens for the Charlie Daniels Band on Sept. 8 in Webster.
A beginner five months ago, Brown said he’s religiously practiced each night before bed to the point he can strum more than a half-dozen songs . . .
Great – he can always live off Ayla if this presidential thing doesn’t work out.
[…] Read the rest at It’s Good to Live in a Two-Daily Town. […]
Does Nixon Peabody know about this?
Does Nixon Peabody even care?
________________________________________
[…] it was Brown traipsing around Iowa that earned him Page One of the Herald. (Q: What’s the difference between Scott Brown and […]
[…] it was Brown traipsing around Iowa that earned him Page One of the Herald. (Q: What’s the difference between Scott Brown and […]
[…] – wasn’t it the Herald that plastered Brown all over the front page last week? What’s this […]