Sunday’s Boston Globe featured a front-page report by Jenifer B. McKim on the monumental effort by law-enforcement officials to identify and prosecute child pornographers, who far more often than not are child rapists as well.
Photo e-mailed from Mass. man led to vast global child pornography network
As soon as they saw the terrified boy’s photo three years ago, federal agents Peter Manning and Gregory Squire had the same thought: we have to save him. The blue-eyed child, about 18 months old, was naked from the waist down and clutching a stuffed rabbit for comfort. There was no doubt he had been sexually abused. But that doesn’t begin to describe his suffering.
“He looked like he had been crying for three days,” Squire recalled in a recent interview.
It’s not as if Manning and Squire hadn’t been faced with this kind of image — and worse — before. Assigned to the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations office in Boston, their job is to track down child pornographers and victims. Over the years, they’ve become painfully familiar with some of the hundreds of thousands of child pornography pictures and videos online. Many depict almost unimaginably grotesque attacks on infants and toddlers and are traded like baseball cards by men using obscure Internet outposts to revel in their depravity.
But that single image of the distraught boy with the toy bunny became a crucial piece of evidence for Manning and Squire. It had been e-mailed to them by a Milford man who thought he was sharing it with fellow child-pornography voyeurs. His miscalculation sparked an investigation that would spread around the world, thus far leading to 42 arrests and the discovery of 140 children who were violated. The youngest was 19 days old.
What follows is a stomach-turning chronicle of the painstaking process of tracking and bringing to justice predators like Robert Diduca, the Milford man who inadvertently triggered the investigation that brought down so many of his fellow rapists.
Which, in turn, is but one more example of why the Boston Globe is an invaluable civic institution that deserves to be financially supported by the local populace.
That’s not to say the Boston Herald doesn’t do solid investigative work of its own.
Just not as often and not as in-depth as the Globe.
So, yes, it’s good to live in a two-daily town.
But it’s better to live in a major-league town with a major-league newspaper.