The Herald Feasts on Chick-fil-A Edition

July 27, 2012

The Boston Herald has sunk its teeth into the Chick-fil-A/gay marriage kerfuffle, and the feisty local tabloid is not about to let go.

It started last week with this piece:

Mayor Menino on Chick-fil-A: Stuff it

Mayor Thomas M. Menino is vowing to block Chick-fil-A from bringing its Southern-fried fast-food empire to Boston — possibly to a popular tourist spot just steps from the Freedom Trail — after the family-owned firm’s president suggested gay marriage is “inviting God’s judgment on our nation.”

“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion,” Menino told the Herald yesterday.

“That’s the Freedom Trail. That’s where it all started right here. And we’re not going to have a company, Chick-fil-A or whatever the hell the name is, on our Freedom Trail.”

That’s a mayor-for-life talking – and shredding the First Amendment – but fast forward to today’s paper, and the Herald has Menino moonwalking like Michael Jackson:

Menino says he can’t actively block Chick-fil-A

Boston Mayor Thomas M. Menino repeated today that he doesn’t want Chick-fil-A in Boston, but he backed away from a threat to actively block the fast-food chain from setting up shop in the city.

“I can’t do that. That would be interference to his rights to go there,” Menino said, referring to company president Dan Cathy, who drew the mayor’s wrath by going public with his views against same-sex marriage.

For all the stuff that happened in between, see here.

Meanwhile, crosstown rival Boston Globe has come late to the party.

The local broadsheet had a single story last week (which seems to be a web piece featuring a :19 clip from NECN).

But the Globe is playing serious catch-up in today’s edition (see here and here and here.)

Regardless, the Herald owns this story.


DOMA v. Sex Offender Registry Edition

July 26, 2012

Different papers, different perspectives.

From Wednesday’s Boston Globe:

Coakley asks high court to sink DOMA

Attorney General Martha Coakley has asked the country’s highest court to uphold a landmark federal ruling in Boston that granted equal rights to same-sex married couples in Massachusetts, urging the high court to officially strike down a federal law that defines marriage solely as a union of a man and a woman.

In a 27-page petition Tuesday, Coakley asked the US Supreme Court to uphold a federal appeals court decision in June that the federal Defense of Marriage Act discriminates against same-sex couples who are legally married, in violation of equal protection laws. That ruling has been stayed until the top court decides whether it will hear the case.

No mention of that in the Boston Herald.

But . . .

From Wednesday’s Herald:

‘SILLY’ POLICY SHELTERS OFFENDERS

The state’s Level 2 sex offenders — from rapists to child porn purveyors — are not listed on any online registry, because some lawmakers are throwing up a roadblock in the name of protecting privacy rights of convicts, advocates charge.

The move is also costing Massachusetts hundreds of thousands in lost crime-fighting bucks and not even Gov. Deval Patrick has been able to convince the holdout legislators to act.

No mention of that in the Globe.

So the hardreading staff went for the tiebreaker.

Only the Inside Track had this:

Oh, baby! Gi’s sooooo pregnant

Well, well, well, wethinks we can take the Gisele Bundchen pregnancy out of the rumor category and file it under confirmed. Because here’s Mrs. Tom Brady[stats] on the beach in Costa Rica with 2-year-old Benjamin sporting an unmistakable baby bump!

The Brazilian supermodel, baby Benji, their dog Lua and other family members were snapped by the paps at x17online.com as they frolicked on the shore near Gi’s vacation home. Brady was not part of the beach party, which is not surprising considering he is due to report for duty down in Foxboro today for the New England Patriots [team stats] 2012 training camp.

IGTLTDT scorecard: Herald 2, Globe 1.


Boston Globe Slashes Staff Edition

July 25, 2012

Tough sledding at the Boston Globe.

No snow.

(Tip o’ the pixel: Marvelous Marvin Sutton.)

From crosstown rival Boston Herald:

Globe slashing up to 53 jobs with layoffs, buyout offers

The Boston Globe has offered buyouts to 20 newsroom staffers and 23 advertising employees, at the same time it laid off 10 people from across the publication, according to the paper’s publisher.

The cutbacks come amid plummeting circulation at the beleaguered broadsheet and renewed speculation that the New York Times Co. is looking to sell the Globe and its sister paper, the Worcester Telegram & Gazette.

The Herald piece proceeds to chronicle other Globe woes (“The latest audit in May saw the Globe’s daily print circulation fall below the 200,000 mark for the first time in its history” and “The Herald also reported in May that the Globe was shuttering its suburban bureaus to avoid taking on any more leases”) that may or may not be true.

Meanwhile, over at the Globe, “several” is apparently a double-digit number:

Boston Globe offers buyouts, lays off several

The Boston Globe on Monday offered buyouts to 43 editorial and advertising employees and laid off about 10 people.

The Globe notified 23 people in advertising and 20 in the newsroom they were eligible for a buyout. The packages are voluntary. Monday’s layoffs did not affect reporters or editors.

But the buyouts surely will.

The hardreading staff’s best suggestion: Monitor the Globe and the Herald, and split the difference.


Defending Vicki Kennedy Edition

July 24, 2012

Yesterday the hardreading staff noted the Sunday Boston Globe piece detailing trouble in Kennedyville, with Patrick and Ted K Jr. complaining that Vicki is pushing them around – and out – in the development of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the US Senate.

The already frayed relationship between Vicki Kennedy and her late husband’s children is at the breaking point, with the two sons growing increasingly convinced that she is jeopardizing the senator’s legacy and mishandling the creation of the $71 million institute that bears his name.

Much of the conflict centers around the construction and governance of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the US Senate, a project that faces potential cost overruns, according to a close family friend who was authorized by some family members to speak on their behalf, but who declined to be named.

Just like a hitman, wanting to remain anonymous.

But today Boston Herald columnist Joe Battenfeld rode to Vicki’s rescue in this piece:

Brat boys’ attack on Vicki Kennedy means family name is . . . 

Tarnished by silver spoons

Ted Kennedy engaged in his share of political mudslinging, but nothing as bad as the smear campaign being waged by his spiteful sons against his still grieving widow.

The anonymous, cowardly attacks against Vicki Kennedy are a new low, even for politics. If Patrick Kennedy and Ted Kennedy Jr. want to whine about their stepmother, they should at least have the guts to do it on their own — not through an unnamed friend.

Fair enough, if a bit overwrought.

For a tiebreker, maybe someone could check in with Hub ubermacher Peter Meade, who resigned as president of the Institute last year. As the Globe reported at the time:

Shortly after construction begins on the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate this spring, its president — handpicked by the senator just before his death — plans to make his exit.

The unexpected resignation of Peter Meade, combined with the recent departure of the chief executive of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation, is fueling a growing sense in Boston’s political circles that there is confusion and conflict behind the scenes among the keepers of the vaunted Kennedy legacy.

In an interview, Meade, a longtime team player with the Kennedy family and one of Boston’s leading civic figures, confirmed he is leaving the institute, but insisted his departure is amicable.

Unlikely the politic Meade would say more now, but it’s worth a try, eh?


Tierney Jailbirds Edition

July 23, 2012

Here’s a textbook case of the Globe/Herald perpetual-motion seesaw.

From Sunday’s Boston Globe:

Troubles in paradise Rep. Tierney somehow missed 

Review finds congressman had many chances to learn of illegal actions by his wife’s brothers – and by her

ST. JOHN’S, Antigua — To hear US Representative John F. Tierney tell it, there was nothing unusual three years ago when he and his wife traveled to this tiny Caribbean island 300 miles east of Puerto Rico for dinner with his brother-in-law Robert Eremian.

“Dinner at my wife’s brother’s house. I don’t think that people would think that’s extraordinary,” Tierney said at a recent news conference.

But Eremian was no ordinary brother-in-law. A convicted drug smuggler and tax evader, Eremian had been under investigation, under indictment, or on probation for activities related to illegal gambling almost continuously since 1995. And, as the couple ate dinner on the patio of Eremian’s gated home that fall night, Eremian and his sister were in deep trouble.

As in, prosecutors were about to drop a 442-count federal indictment on Eremian and three of his cohorts. But Tierney had no inkling something like that might happen. Even though he clearly should have, according to the Globe report:

[A] Boston Globe review of court records and other publicly available information shows that John Tierney had ample reason to be wary of his brothers-in-law during his 15 years of marriage to their sister and many opportunities over the last decade to learn that their Antigua-based gambling business was illegally targeting American gamblers.

In fact, John Tierney had reason to be suspicious from the day he married Patrice. At that point, Bob Eremian had fled to Antigua to escape federal prosecution for illegal sports book-making, and had recruited one of Patrice’s children, John Chew, to work with him. After a lengthy federal investigation, Bob Eremian pleaded guilty to tax evasion in the gambling case in 2002.

There’s plenty more where that came from. This is a major takeout, the kind of investigative reporting the Globe routinely undertakes.

Not so much over at the Boston Herald. But that doesn’t mean the feisty tabloid brings nothing to the party.

From today’s edition:

Tierney’s in-law fails at try to shave sentence

An ingenious bid by U.S. Rep. John Tierney’s convicted brother-in-law to lengthen his prison stint by a month in order to become eligible for a one-year reduction in his sentence has been rejected by a federal judge.

In June, U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris sentenced Daniel Eremian to 36 months for operating an illegal offshore gambling website that reaped millions from American bettors. Late last week, Saris issued an order denying the 62-year-old Eremian’s request that his sentence be revised to 37 months.

The Herald owns this story – here’s its earlier report on Eremian’s bid. As far as the hardworking staff can tell, the Globe hasn’t had anything on it.

So there you have one template for this two-daily town: The Globe brings resources to bear, the Herald scrambles for scoops. That’s not always the case, but often enough for a sampler.

 


Feuding Kennedys Edition

July 23, 2012

Say, that was some scoop the Sunday Boston Globe got about the fussin’ and fightin’ among the Kennedy clan over the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the US Senate, yeah?

A RARITY IN CAMELOT: A PUBLIC FAMILY FEUD

Late senator’s sons at odds with widow

The already frayed relationship between Vicki Kennedy and her late husband’s children is at the breaking point, with the two sons growing increasingly convinced that she is jeopardizing the senator’s legacy and mishandling the creation of the $71 million institute that bears his name.

Much of the conflict centers around the construction and governance of the Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the US Senate, a project that faces potential cost overruns, according to a close family friend who was authorized by some family members to speak on their behalf, but who declined to be named.

At issue: “Edward M. Kennedy Jr. and Patrick Kennedy, the senator’s children, believe their father’s widow is badly bungling the efforts to create what their father had hoped would be a monument to his storied career in the US Senate, said the friend, whose account was confirmed by another close family associate.”

Also problematic:

Hard feelings have developed over the institute’s presence in the Kennedy family’s Hyannis Port compound. The institute, which earlier this year took possession of the original mansion and the sprawling lawn, is now charging a rental fee to the remaining family members who own property there if they want to gather on or in some way use the lawn that is the central part of the 2.4-acre waterfront lot.

The institute has also made the main house, which has been virtually unused since the senator’s death in 2009, out of bounds for use by the family.

Allowing the family to freely use the property and the house “would jeopardize [the Institute’s] nonprofit status,” according to Institute officials.

So how did Globe gumshoe Frank Phillips get this story when the Boston Herald didn’t?

Neither son would comment publicly. But their decision to authorize a friend to share their concerns about their stepmother’s leadership role in the institute is a highly unusual public breach within the famous political family, which has traditionally strived to avoid the public airing of internal disagreements and spats.

In other words, Little Ed and Patches picked the Boston Globe to be their House (of Kennedy) Organ.

The Globe didn’t get this story. It came to them.

Keep that in mind when you read it.

 


Fred Willard PBS Backlash Edition

July 22, 2012

After the Boston Globe got totally pwned on Friday by the Boston Herald and New York Times on the Fred Willard: At the Movies story, the local broadsheet bounced back on Saturday with the bounce-back against the firing of Mr. Worst in (PBS) Show:

PBS criticized for firing Fred Willard

The decision by PBS to fire actor Fred Willard after his arrest for lewd conduct at an adult movie theater in LA is spurring something of a backlash. The network wasted no time in canning Willard, who was narrator of the WGBH-produced show “Market Warriors,” a spinoff of “Antiques Roadshow.” (In a statement Thursday, WGBH flack Jeanne Hopkins cited “the unfortunate news” of Willard’s arrest as the reason for his immediate dismissal.) That decision didn’t sit well with a lot of people, some of whom tweeted #FreeFred and “Shame on you, PBS.” Writing in Entertainment Weekly, Ken Tucker also criticized PBS. “How does Willard’s innocent-until-proven-guilty status merit this? Will viewers really refuse to watch ‘Market Warriors’ because they’ll be repulsed, outraged, by the sound of Fred Willard’s voice?” Contacted Friday, Hopkins said she had nothing to add.

The Herald had nothing in Saturday’s edition. Ditto for the Times.

Score one (sad story) for the Boston Globe.

 


Previously on It’s Good to Live in a Two-Daily Town

July 21, 2012

For Campaign Outsider’s IGTLTDT archive, click here.

Bon appétit!


Fred Willard (Adult) Edition

July 21, 2012

“Best in Show” actor Fred Willard hit the news this week in some, well, unfortunate circumstances.

From Friday’s Boston Globe (link removed):

Fred Willard arrested

Actor Fred Willard was arrested Wednesday [!] on suspicion of committing a lewd act at a Hollywood adult theater. Los Angeles police said officers were conducting a routine investigation of the theater and saw Willard engaged in a lewd act.

That turned into “Worst in Show” for WGBH. From Friday’s Boston Herald:

“Best In Show” star Fred Willard, arrested for pulling a Pee-wee Herman in an adult movie theater in Los Angeles, was fired from his gig on a Boston-producedPBS series less than 24 hours later.

WGBH, which produces the “Market Warriors” show, terminated the comedian after Willard was charged with “lewd conduct” by undercover LAPD cops who allegedly caught the actor with his pants down in the Tiki Theater.

“Given the unfortunate news reported (yesterday), effective immediately Fred Willard no longer will be involved with the ‘Market Warriors’ series,” said Jeanne Hopkins, a spokesgal for Boston’s Channel 2.

The 70-something Willard was the narrator for “Market Warriors,” described as a cross between “The Amazing Race” and “Antiques Roadshow.”

To recap: The Herald was a full news cycle ahead of the Globe on this story.

Which seems totally appropriate.

P.S. Friday’s New York Times also beat the Globe like a rug:

Fred Willard Loses PBS Job After Arrest

The fallout has been swift for the actor and comedian Fred Willard, who was arrested in Hollywood on Wednesday night on a charge of lewd conduct. PBS said Thursday that Mr. Willard had lost his job as the wisecracking narrator of its new show “Market Warriors.” On Monday, PBS introduced the first of 20 episodes of this “Antiques Roadshow” spinoff,  which pits professional antiques pickers in a competition to spot the best bargain.

Jeanne Hopkins, a spokeswoman for WGBH, the Boston public broadcaster that produces the show, said via e-mail, “Given the unfortunate news reported today, effective immediately, Fred Willard no longer will be involved with the ‘Market Warriors’ series.” The host of “Antiques Roadshow,” Mark Walberg, will re-voice the episodes that Mr. Willard has already taped, Ms. Hopkins said.

To recap: Everybody was a full news cycle ahead of the Globe on this story.

Before you splendid readers start berating the hardworking staff of IGTLTDT – no, it doesn’t matter.

It’s just interesting.

(Editor’s Note: All quotes from dead-tree editions of the papers.)